The idea for Islamization of knowledge had started in the 1970-s and start spreading among Muslim intellectuals and activists around 1980-s. It was a shift in identity for Muslims especially after the rise of Muslim states such as Egypt, Pakistan and Indonesia and decolonization by British, Dutch and French Empires in Asia and Africa continent. It is also an evidence of the increasing young and upcoming Muslims studied in the West and start going back to their home countries to help develop it, especially in the education sector. They don’t want to copy exactly what the schools and universities in the West because they see that values in the West is contradictory with Islamic values.
One of the first proponents of Islamization of Knowledge is Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas, who presented paper on Islamization and Desecularization at Makkah Educational Conference 1977. Islamization was defines by al-Attas as the liberation of man first from from magical, mythological, animistic, national-cultural tradition, and then from secular control over his reason and his language. Al-Attas emphasize heavily on language especially the Arabic language because it was the language that the Holy Quran was revealed to human through Prophet Muhammad S.A.W. He said that language, thought and reason are closely interconnected and are indeed independent in projecting to man his worldview or vision of reality.
Another
proponent of Islamization of knowledge is Ismail Raji’ al-Faruqi. He sees that
the most important aspect in Islamization is Tawheed which is the basic and
unifying principle of Islam. Through Tawheed, a Muslims man views the reality,
truth, the world, space and time, human history and destiny. Allah as the
Creator of Nature and knowledge, gives man His knowledge which is absolute and
universal. Several fundamental principles of Islamizing modern knowledge are
the Unity of Allah, the Unity of Creation, the Unity of Knowledge, the Unity of
Life and the Unity of Humanity.
An Iranian
scholar, Seyyed Hussein Nasr also touches on the issue of Islamization of
knowledge. He talks about scientia sacra, which is science as knowledge must
not be devoid from the sacred. It is the application of metaphysical principles
to the macrocosm as well as microcosm, the natural as well as human world.
Knowledge is sacred and is from God, and can only be understood through
revelation and intellectual reasoning.
Muhammad Kamal
Hassan in 2014 talks about Islamicisation of Human Knowledge. It was to provide
an alternative to the secular knowledge and modern civilization. The secular
environment in education had created a bias toward any religion or faith. To
Islamicize knowledge, a critical analysis should be done on the concept of
Tawheed and ethics in Islam. The word Islamicize means that it was to conform
and being in harmony with religion instead of being understood as converting
people to Islam. It was also can be construed as a larger concept that anything
could be connected to Islam and complies with the teaching and principles of
Islam.
The method of
Islamization practiced by al-Attas is that first, we must separate all Western
elements (Desecularization) in the current existing knowledge that had been
learns by Muslims for decades. Secondly, the knowledge then infused with
Islamic elements and key concepts were redefined according to Islamic
worldview. Several concept in our knowledge that had been corrupted by Western
such as the nature of man (insan), religion (din), knowledge (‘ilm and
ma’rifah), wisdom (hikmah), justice (‘adl), right action (adab) and university
(kuliyyah).
One of the institutions
created by al-Attas to further the project of Islamization of Knowledge is International
Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC). Al-Attas was not only
the first director and chair of Al-Ghazali, he also regularly teaches at the
main hall especially on the religion of Islam. His understanding of the world
is different from others, where he sees that this world is not a dichotomy
against the religion of Islam and the hereafter. The world is merely a stage
and preparation for eternal life later. The universe is like a book and needed
to be read. But only looking at words is not enough, we need to understand the
meaning behind it. This is the same with all the creation that we see in this
world. Every creation has purpose and meaning. This kind of teaching elevates
the understanding of Islam teaches in this institute. It goes beyond the usual
studies on fiqh and tafsir.
Al-Faruqi
methods also involves learning both the Western and Islamic tradition. But for
al-Faruqi, Muslim scholars that learned the knowledge needed to be detecting
the Islamic legacy in each discipline. This method opens for discovery of
Islamic scholars contribution in the past to the rise of enlightenment in the
West. Meanwhile, the Islamic tradition itself needed to be re-examined their
shortcomings. Some aspect of the knowledge needed to be updated in accordance
to the reality of the world today. In the future, a Muslim that was trained in
both the West and Islamic tradition, understands their criticism will create a new
discipline that have strong Islamic values in it.
Al-Faruqi also
created International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) with prominent
scholars such as Taha Jabir al-Alwani and Ahmad Totonji. They have more
practical method by becoming a network of Muslim scholars around the world that
agree to disseminate the Islamize knowledge to Muslim ummah. IIIT published a
lot of intellectual books and textbook for students to be used in the
university. This books is not only used by Islamic studies students, but it was
also widely used by students is sciences courses. This is because they wanted
lecturers and students to infuse the Islamic values in any knowledge they teach
and learned.
The efforts of
IIIT members such as Abdul Hamid AbuSulayman and Anwar Ibrahim help formed
International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) in 1983. This university is
unique in a sense that the Islamic studies course was taken as a double major
course with Human Sciences. This is an attempt to develop new scholars that has
strong Islamic tradition and understanding of the modern sciences. This duality
provide students with a wide scope of knowledge and mastery in contemporary
tool.
Nasr also writes
about the importance of mastering the Western thought and try to understand
their philosophical contradiction. There is no problem with the knowledge
itself, but their philosophical roots. Only by mastering the sciences, the West
will heed the Muslim voice and we can start infusing the Islamic values. The
scholars also need to have strong spiritual and Islamic worldview. This is to
prevent the Muslims themselves to become too involved in the Western tradition
and deviated from Islamic teachings.
Nasr also have
the same idea with al-Attas which is that language plays main role in knowledge
dissemination. He regrets that most Muslim countries was colonized in their
mind through using the European language and abandoning the native language
that had strong Islamic roots. The usage of this native language is also
important in learning about modern sciences to free Muslim from relying to
Western technologies. This is why Muslims in the earlier centuries rigorously
translate all Greek intellectual works to Arabic because they understand the
effect of language to the mind of Muslims.
The biggest
criticism of Islamization of knowledge is that certain scholars argue that the
body of knowledge itself is not wrong, but it becomes wrong when it is misused.
So it was the question of ethics. The word Islamization itself could distance
non-Muslims, and can be seen as denying them to the knowledge itself. This is
why some scholars argue that the most important things to is to integrate both
knowledge of the West, Islamic and other Eastern traditions so that the
knowledge itself will become more inclusive and globalize.
References
Abdul Hamid AbuSulayman, Revitalizing
Higher Education in the Muslim World, 2007.
Febri Priyoyudanto, Model of
Islamization of Knowledge; Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas, Ismael Raji
al-Faruqi, And Fazlur Rahman, 2013.
Mohd Asham Ahmad, How Islam was
Taught at ISTAC, 2016.
Muhammad Shawal bin Abdul Rashid, Islamization
of Human Knowledge: A Critical Analysis, 2014.
Yahaya Musa Yusuf, Seyyed
Hussein Nasr on Islamisation of Knowledge.
No comments:
Post a Comment